Philippine information you can trace to its source 日本語JAEnglishENTagalogTL
Home › History › The American Period (1898–1946)

The American Period (1898–1946)

As of 2026-08-30 · Updated 2026-08-30 · Section: History · 日本語版

Along with the 333-year Spanish period, the roughly 48-year American period is impossible to skip if you want to understand the Philippines. English, public education, the presidential system, judicial review, and even today's IT-BPM industry — much of what makes the present-day Philippines both "easy to work with" and "distorted" traces back to this half-century. Below is an organization of the record, drawn as far as possible from primary sources (treaty texts, US federal statute texts, and government-agency materials) that could be checked directly.


0. Quick-reference timeline

Date Event Source
1898-12-10 Treaty of Paris signed. Spain cedes the Philippine Islands to the United States Treaty text (Yale Avalon Project)
1899-02-04 The Philippine–American War begins US Department of State, Office of the Historian
1900-11-07 Treaty of Washington signed. It further settles sovereignty over Cagayan (Mapun), Sulu, and Sibutu, which lay outside the line drawn by Article III of the Treaty of Paris, with the US paying $100,000 within six months of the exchange of ratifications (source replaced 2026-08-27: the earlier draft relied jointly on the treaty text and the English Wikipedia. Source: the original treaty text as published in the Philippine Official Gazette, and the Supreme Court E-Library, retrieved 2026-08-27. The specific date "effective 23 March 1901" could not be re-confirmed against a primary source in this session; only that payment was made sometime "in March 1901" could be confirmed) Philippine Official Gazette / Supreme Court E-Library
1901-01-21 Act No. 74 establishes the Department of Public Instruction (corrected from 01-20 to 01-21 in the 2026-08-25 verification pass) As of 2026-08-27, the source has not been replaced: no primary source to replace the two English Wikipedia items in the earlier draft could be identified in this session = needs re-verification
1901-06-11 Act No. 136 (the Judiciary Act) — the direct origin of today's Supreme Court Philippine Supreme Court materials
1901-08-21 The USAT Thomas, carrying the Thomasite teachers, arrives in Manila Educational-history materials
1901-09-28 The Balangiga incident Various historical sources
1902-07-01 The Philippine Organic Act (Philippine Bill of 1902) Legislative materials
1902-07-04 President Theodore Roosevelt declares the war's end US Department of State, Office of the Historian
1903-06-01 Moro Province established (Act No. 787) Moro Province materials
1906-03-05~08 The Battle of Bud Dajo Battle records
1907-07-30 / 10-16 Election and opening of the Philippine Assembly Legislative records
1913-06-11~15 The Battle of Bud Bagsak = the end of the Moro Rebellion Battle records
1916-08-29 The Philippine Autonomy Act (Jones Law) US federal statute
1934-03-24 The Tydings–McDuffie Act (Philippine Independence Act) US Statutes at Large, 48 Stat. 456 (confirmed against the original text)
1935-05-02~03 The Sakdal Uprising Library of Congress Country Study, among others
1935-05-14 Plebiscite ratifying the 1935 Constitution Constitutional-history materials
1935-11-15 The Commonwealth is inaugurated, with Quezon as first President Same
1941-12-08 Japanese forces begin their attack Library of Congress Country Study
1946-04-30 / 07-02 The Bell Trade Act passed by the US Congress / ratified by the Philippine Congress Legislative materials
1946-07-04 Independence (Treaty of Manila) Same

1. The Treaty of Paris — was the Philippines "bought" for $20 million?

Article III of the Treaty of Paris, signed 10 December 1898, provided that Spain would cede the Philippine Islands to the United States, and set out the consideration in its own text as follows (treaty text held by Yale Law School's Avalon Project):

The United States will pay to Spain the sum of twenty million dollars ($20,000,000) within three months after the exchange of the ratifications of the present treaty.

In other words, the provision is that $20 million would be paid within three months of the exchange of ratifications.

注 In Japanese-language circles this is often summarized as "the US bought the Philippines for $20 million," but the text of the treaty is structured as "cession" plus "payment" — it does not take the form of a sale-and-purchase contract. Also worth noting: Article II ceded Puerto Rico and Guam without any payment, so the fact that a price attached only to the Philippines reflects a compromise reached in negotiation.

注 Emilio Aguinaldo had declared independence on 12 June 1898, and the First Republic (the Malolos Republic) had been established in January 1899 — but the Philippine side was not included among the treaty's parties at all. This is the starting point of the Filipino historical narrative that "the victory of the independence war was hijacked." The Philippines moved its independence day from 4 July to 12 June in 1962 (under President Macapagal), and 12 June 2026 marked the 128th Independence Day celebration (per multiple June 2026 news reports).


2. The Philippine–American War (1899–1902) and the dispute over the death toll

Fighting began on 4 February 1899 in a clash on the outskirts of Manila. The following table sets out the official figures given by the US Department of State's Office of the Historian, alongside the range found in historical research.

Category Figure Source / note
US military deaths Over 4,200 US Department of State, Office of the Historian
—of which, combat deaths 1,020 A commonly cited figure (distinguished from 3,176 deaths from disease)
Filipino combatant deaths Over 20,000 US Department of State, Office of the Historian
—contemporary US estimate 16,000–20,000 Contemporary US military estimate
—Aguinaldo's own estimate About 10,000 Even the estimates themselves diverge by a factor of two
Civilian deaths About 200,000 US Department of State, Office of the Historian
—typical range in modern historical scholarship 200,000–250,000 Mostly attributable to famine and disease
—some estimates Up to 1,000,000 Sources diverge wildly
—cholera outbreak late in the war At least 150,000 Distinguishing war deaths from epidemic deaths is at the heart of the dispute

Why does the death toll range five-fold, from "200,000" to "1,000,000"? There are essentially three points of contention: (1) how far to count "excess deaths" from famine and disease — rather than combat deaths — as war-caused; (2) how to treat deaths caused by the US Army's policy of reconcentration (forcibly interning the population in "protection zones"); and (3) the fact that the pre-war Filipino population itself is only an estimate. 注 When citing a figure, one must always note "whose estimate it is" and "whether it counts combat deaths only, or excess deaths as well."

Main sequence of events: Malolos fell in March 1899, and the fighting shifted to guerrilla warfare from November of that year. On 23 March 1901, forces under Brigadier General Frederick Funston captured Aguinaldo.

注 (Corrected in the 2026-08-25 verification) The earlier draft's claim that "US military rule ended on 16 June 1902" could not be sourced and the date was wrong. The correct sequence unfolds in two stages (source replaced 2026-08-27: the earlier draft cited the English Wikipedia article "Insular Government of the Philippine Islands" as its source. Sources: the US House of Representatives' official historical archive, "The Philippines, 1898–1946" (history.house.gov), and National Archives records of the Bureau of Insular Affairs. Retrieved 2026-08-27):

The fact that "the end of military rule" and "the declaration of the war's end" both fall on 4 July (in 1901 and 1902 respectively) is the source of the confusion. Always attach the year.

注 However, this "1902 end" declaration applies only to the Christian-majority regions of Luzon and the Visayas; the Moro Rebellion in the Muslim regions continued from May 1902 through June 1913. "The war ended in three years" is inaccurate.


3. The Balangiga incident and the 2018 return of the bells

3-1. What happened in 1901

On 28 September 1901, in Balangiga, Eastern Samar, Company C of the US 9th Infantry Regiment, while eating breakfast, was attacked by residents and Filipino forces.

注 (Corrected in the 2026-08-25 verification) The earlier draft's claim that "48 of 78 died" is incorrect. The actual breakdown is as follows (source replaced 2026-08-27: the earlier draft cited the English Wikipedia article "Balangiga massacre" as its source. Sources: the official website of the US Marine Corps Museum (usmcmuseum.com), "The Battle of Balangiga – Samar 1901"; US History Scene; and kahimyang.com. The death toll ranges from 48 to 54 across sources. Retrieved 2026-08-27):

Category Number
Total strength of Company C 74
Killed outright (including all 3 officers) 36
Died of wounds later 8
Wounded 22
Missing 4
Unharmed 4

The figure "48 dead" comes from adding together the 36 killed outright, the 8 who died of wounds, and the 4 missing, and counting them all as dead; the correct baseline figure is also "74," not "78." Do not simply write "48 dead" without stating which counting method is being used. The church bell is said to have been used as the signal for the attack.

In reprisal, Brigadier General Jacob H. Smith is recorded as having ordered that Samar be turned into a "howling wilderness," directing that anyone capable of bearing arms who was 10 years of age or older be shot. Smith and Marine Major Littleton Waller were court-martialed; Waller was acquitted, and Smith was found guilty but received only a reprimand and was retired from service, with the prosecution soon dropped.

US forces brought back 3 church bells as trophies (cast in 1853, 1889, and 1895).

3-2. The return, 117 years later

Item Content
Where held The two larger bells at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming (formerly Fort D.A. Russell, Cheyenne); the smaller bell with the 9th Infantry Regiment at Camp Red Cloud, US Forces Korea
Political catalyst On 24 July 2017, President Duterte demanded in his State of the Nation Address (SONA), "Give us back those Balangiga bells. They are ours."
Legal process Provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) were amended, and in August 2018 Secretary of Defense Mattis notified Congress of the intent to return the bells
Handover 14–15 November 2018, transferred to the Philippine ambassador at Warren Air Force Base
Consolidation and transport 10 December 2018: all 3 bells consolidated at Kadena Air Base → 11 December: arrived at Villamor Air Base, Manila
Return 15 December 2018, returned to San Lorenzo de Martir Parish Church in Balangiga

注 Some Japanese-language articles state "all 3 were in Wyoming," which is incorrect — one was in Korea. 注 It also should not be characterized as "the US apologized" — the return was carried out separately from any apology or reparations.


4. Pacification policy and the "policy of attraction"

American rule cannot be explained by military suppression alone. The Library of Congress Country Study attributes much of its success to co-opting the Filipino elite (the ilustrados) — the so-called "policy of attraction."

This "preservation of the elite" is the direct origin of what continues today as the dominance of political dynasties in local government. The Country Study records that neither Sergio Osmeña nor Manuel Quezon "had an essential interest in social reform."


5. The Thomasites and English-language education

Act No. 74, of 21 January 1901, established the Department of Public Instruction (corrected from 20 to 21 January in the 2026-08-25 verification pass. As of 2026-08-27 the source has not been replaced: no primary source to replace the earlier draft's English Wikipedia citation could be identified in this session = needs re-verification). That same year, a large contingent of American teachers was dispatched.

Item Figure Source / note (source clarified in 2026-08-25 verification)
Departure/arrival Departed San Francisco 23 July 1901 → arrived Manila 21 August 1901 Source replaced 2026-08-27: the earlier draft cited the English Wikipedia article "Thomasites." Source: Inquirer, "August 21, 1901: The arrival of the Thomasites." Transport ship: USAT Thomas (origin of the term "Thomasite"). Retrieved 2026-08-27
Size of the first contingent About 500–530 people The same article gives two figures within the same piece — "nearly 500" and "365 men/165 women = 530." 注"346 men/180 women" is a separate figure from another source, unconfirmed against a primary source in this research
Origin 43 states, 193 institutions (elsewhere in the same article, "192 institutions") Same source. 注Even within a single article the figures shift, so cite the number of institutions as a range
Cumulative total through 1902 About 1,074 Same
Dispatch cost About $105,000 (equivalent to roughly $4.06 million in 2025 dollars) Same

Major institutions founded: the Philippine Normal School (1901, now PNU), Silliman (1901), and the University of the Philippines (1908). Beginning in 1903, the pensionado program also sent government-funded students to the United States (the first year drew about 20,000 applicants for 100 places, and the program ran until 1943).

The 1925 Monroe Survey examined 32,000 pupils and 1,077 teachers, finding that while arithmetic and science achievement matched American students at the same grade level, English proficiency lagged significantly, half of children were not reaching school at all, and 82% did not advance past the fourth grade. 注 The simple narrative that "the US made the entire nation English-speaking" is refuted by the US's own survey.

注The widely repeated claim that "the Thomasites made the Philippines the world's third-largest English-speaking country" is common, but no source specifying the metric (native speakers or second-language speakers, and which survey) could be confirmed in this research, so the ranking should be treated as unconfirmed. For reference, Ethnologue (2020) puts the Philippines' English speakers at 200,000 as a first language and 52 million as a second language.


6. Public health — gains and costs

On the other hand, the cholera pandemic of 1902–04 in the early period of American rule killed 200,222 people, of whom 66,000 were children — roughly 3% of the population — recorded as the worst epidemic in Philippine public-health history (Department of Health historical materials). 注 Because this overlaps in period and geography with the civilian-death estimates for the Philippine–American War, one must be careful not to double-count "war deaths" and "epidemic deaths."

注 The modernization of public health is a real fact, but it also carries the flip side of being the aftermath of an epidemic spread by wartime reconcentration policy and troop movements. A story of "public health was brought to us" tells only half the picture.


7. The "Filipinization" of politics

7-1. The 1907 Philippine Assembly

On 30 July 1907, the first nationwide election in Philippine history was held, and the Philippine Assembly (the lower house) opened on 16 October, with 80 seats (81 from 1909). The counterpart to a senate was the appointive Philippine Commission, forming a bicameral structure. The Nacionalista Party (founded 1907), campaigning for immediate and complete independence, took the majority, with Osmeña as Speaker and Quezon as majority floor leader.

注Some accounts describe this as "Asia's first popularly elected legislature," but the materials checked for this article found no support for that claim, and it is treated as unconfirmed. What can be said with confidence is that it was "the first nationwide-elected legislature in Philippine history."

注 The franchise was limited to adult men meeting literacy and property requirements, so eligible voters were a small fraction of the population. The Country Study describes the expansion of suffrage as "literate men (1916)" then "women (1938)."

7-2. The 1916 Jones Law

Under the Philippine Autonomy Act (Jones Law), 29 August 1916, the appointive Philippine Commission was abolished, and a bicameral, popularly elected legislature — a 24-seat Senate and a 90-seat House — was established. Quezon became Senate President and Osmeña became Speaker of the House.

Issue Content
Authority retained by the US side The Governor-General, appointed by the US President, retained a veto over legislation
Treatment of Moro areas Legislators for non-Christian areas were appointed by the Governor-General. Muslim regions were effectively excluded from the jurisdiction of the Filipino-elected legislature
Numbers on Filipinization Under Governor-General Harrison (1913–21), Filipino officials rose from 6,363 to 13,240, and American officials fell from 2,623 to 614 (Library of Congress Country Study)

This structure of treating Moro areas separately laid the groundwork for the "Christian-majority central government vs. Muslim" conflict pattern of the latter half of the 20th century.


8. The Tydings–McDuffie Act (1934) and the Commonwealth

Enacted 24 March 1934 (Public No. 127, 48 Stat. 456). The main provisions confirmed by checking the text directly in the US Statutes at Large are as follows.

Section Content
Section 1 Delegates to a constitutional convention must be elected no later than 1 October 1934
Section 2(a)(8) The constitution must provide for the establishment and maintenance of "a system of public schools primarily conducted in the English language" (English-language education was a legal obligation under US law)
Section 2(a)(9) Laws relating to currency, coinage, imports and exports, and immigration would not take effect without the approval of the President of the United States
Section 2(a)(10) Foreign affairs were placed directly under US supervision and control
Section 4 The constitution would be submitted to a plebiscite
Section 6(a) Duty-free quota for sugar to the US: normal tariffs would apply above 50,000 long tons of refined sugar and 800,000 long tons of raw sugar
Section 6(b)(c) Duty-free quotas of 200,000 long tons of coconut oil and 3 million pounds total of cordage made from Manila hemp (abaca)
Section 6(e) From the sixth year onward, an export tax would be imposed, stepping up in stages from 5% → 10% → 15% → 20% → 25%
Section 7(4) Established a US High Commissioner; in the event of default, this office could even take over seizure and operation of customs
Section 8(a)(1) Under immigration law, Filipinos were treated as "aliens," with an annual quota of 50 (for Hawaii, the Department of the Interior would separately decide based on industrial needs)
Section 10(a) Sovereignty would be relinquished and independence recognized on the first 4 July after 10 years had elapsed since the new government took office
Section 13 After independence, the same tariffs applied to the Philippines as to any other foreign country

The Act's passage in the US was not motivated by "goodwill" alone. The Country Study cites both fear among American sugar-beet, tobacco, and dairy producers of competition from low-tariff island products, and pressure from labor unions seeking to exclude Filipino workers. That the independence provision and the 50-person immigration quota were written into the same law speaks plainly to this motivation.

The formation and evolution of the Commonwealth

Date Event
1934-07-30 Constitutional convention convened
1935-02-08 The 1935 Constitution passed 177 to 1
1935-05-14 Ratified by plebiscite
1935-09-16 Presidential election. Quezon (President) and Osmeña (Vice President) elected
1935-11-15 The Commonwealth is inaugurated
1935-12 National Defense Act (Commonwealth Act No. 1). MacArthur becomes military adviser
1937 Executive order making Tagalog the basis of the national language (took effect two years later)
1939~40 Constitutional amendment converting the unicameral National Assembly into a bicameral legislature
1944-08-01 Quezon dies (in exile). Osmeña succeeds him
1946-07-04 The Commonwealth dissolves; independence

注 "Commonwealth" did not mean "an independent nation." Foreign affairs and national defense remained in US hands, laws on currency, immigration, and trade required the US President's approval, and Supreme Court rulings were subject to review by the US Supreme Court. The accurate way to understand it is as ten years of domestic self-government.


9. Free trade with the US and dependence on the sugar economy

Year System Content
1909 The Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act Made Philippine goods duty-free in principle, though rice, sugar, and tobacco remained subject to quotas or normal tariffs
1913 The Underwood Tariff Act All restrictions removed — full free trade with the US
1934 The Jones-Costigan Act / the Tydings–McDuffie Act Introduced quotas on sugar (the US sugar-quota system continued into the early 1970s)

What changed during the period of American rule (Library of Congress Country Study)

Indicator Figure
Share of exports going to the US 1914–20: 50% → 1939: 85%
Population 1905: 7.6 million → 1939: 16 million
Cultivated land 1903: 1.3 million ha → 1935: 4 million ha
Income concentration In 1939, the top 10% captured 40% of national income
Number of owner-cultivated farms 1918: 1.5 million → 1939: 800,000 (halved)
Resident Chinese (1931) 80,000–100,000
Resident Japanese (1931) About 16,000 (concentrated in Davao's abaca industry)

The picture is this: the duty-free US market drove expansion of monoculture in sugar, coconut oil, and abaca, and export income concentrated among sugarcane landlords (in places such as Negros). At the same time, owner-farmers fell into tenancy, and tenant unrest intensified in central Luzon. The 1933 Rice Share Tenancy Act was nominally meant to increase tenants' share, but was hollowed out in local implementation and had little practical effect.

注The assessment that "American rule developed the economy" cannot be separated from the fact that the same data also shows a one-sided dependence on the US and a rising number of landless farmers. Any citation of export figures should be paired with the number of owner-cultivated farms.


10. The Sakdal Uprising (1935)

Discontent over tenancy problems and "a 10-year wait for independence" crystallized into the Sakdal movement.

Item Content
Leader Benigno Ramos. Born 10 February 1892 (Bulacan, Bulacan Province) / went missing in 1945 while traveling on a Japanese military aircraft (the plane he boarded is said to have crashed shortly after takeoff, and his body was never found) (corrected in the 2026-08-25 verification from the earlier draft's "1893–1946." Source replaced 2026-08-27: the earlier draft cited the English Wikipedia article "Benigno Ramos." Sources: EBSCO Research Starters, "Sakdalista"; military-history.fandom.com, "Benigno Ramos." Retrieved 2026-08-27). His earlier career included being recruited as a Senate translator by Quezon in 1917; he returned to Manila aboard the German liner Gneisenau on 28 August 1938
Publication The newspaper Sakdal launched 28 June 1930 (biweekly). "Sakdal" is Tagalog for "to accuse" (echoing Zola's "J'accuse") (source replaced 2026-08-27: the earlier draft cited the English Wikipedia article "Sakdalista." Source: CNN Philippines, "The 1930s Filipino newspaper that fought American occupation." Retrieved 2026-08-27)
Becomes a party 1933 (Country Study)
Scale 注Sources give differing figures (2026-08-25 verification): the earlier draft said "about 200,000 supporters by early 1935" (attributed to the Country Study, but this research could not reach the cited page and it remains unconfirmed) / other sources give about 20,000 formal party members, with several hundred thousand Filipinos under its influence (source replaced 2026-08-27: the earlier draft cited the English Wikipedia article "Sakdalista." Sources: EBSCO Research Starters; Britannica, "Sakdal Uprising." Retrieved 2026-08-27). The order of magnitude changes depending on whether one means "party members" or "supporters under its influence," so always specify which unit is being cited when giving a number. Both figures are retained rather than deleting either
1934 election Won all 3 of the House seats it contested. Produced the governor of Marinduque Province, and won numerous municipal posts in Laguna, Bulacan, Rizal, and Cavite
Uprising 2–3 May 1935 (the action was announced late on the night of 1 May). On the night of 2 May, an estimated 68,000 people gathered at rally points across the country (as of 2026-08-27, the source has not been replaced: no primary source to replace the earlier draft's citation of the English Wikipedia article "Sakdalista" could be identified in this session = needs re-verification. Not a confirmed figure). The rebels had hoped for defections from the Constabulary, but were fired upon and the uprising failed
Casualties About 100 dead (the Washington Post reported 69 as of noon on 3 May, with the final toll settling at around 100), over 1,000 arrested (same source)
Aftermath Ramos fled into exile in Japan and later formed the Ganap Party

Timing was decisive: the uprising broke out immediately before the plebiscite on the 1935 Constitution (14 May), and the Sakdalistas opposed both "independence being pushed back 10 years" and the Commonwealth constitution itself. 注 The narrative that "the Commonwealth began amid nationwide welcome" leaves out the fact that roughly 100 people had just died.

Afterward, the legislature passed three concessions: land redistribution, a National Rice and Corn Corporation, and a public-defender system for the poor.


11. Muslim Mindanao — Moro Province rule and settlement policy

11-1. Moro Province (1903–1914)

Item Content
Establishment / dissolution Established 1 June 1903 under Act No. 787; reorganized into the Department of Mindanao and Sulu on 23 July 1914
Jurisdiction South of 8° North latitude (excluding Palawan). Five districts: Cotabato, Davao, Lanao, Zamboanga, and Jolo (Sulu)
Governors Leonard Wood (1903–06) → Tasker Bliss (1906–09) → John Pershing (1909–13) → Frank Carpenter (1913–14)
Governing structure Below the district level, traditional "tribal wards" led by a datu were maintained, while Christian settlements were organized as elected municipalities

11-2. Two episodes of bloodshed

Battle Date / commander Casualties
Bud Dajo 5–8 March 1906, Jolo Island. Ordered by Leonard Wood, led by Colonel Joseph W. Duncan with 750 troops Moro side, 800–900 killed (including women and children), out of 800–1,000 who had taken refuge, with 6 survivors. US side: 15–21 killed, 70 wounded. 注Some tallies give US losses as "21 killed, 75 wounded" or "18 killed, 52 wounded" (2026-08-25 verification. Source replaced 2026-08-27: the earlier draft cited the English Wikipedia article "First Battle of Bud Dajo." Sources: Prospect Magazine, "An American massacre—1,200 dead"; History is Now Magazine, "The Bud Dajo Massacre." Moro-side deaths carry an even wider range, from an official tally of 994 up to over 1,200 across sources. Retrieved 2026-08-27)
Bud Bagsak 11–15 June 1913, Jolo Island. Commanded by Pershing Moro side, 200–300 (Pershing's estimate). US side: 14 killed, 25 wounded

After Bud Dajo, President Roosevelt sent a congratulatory telegram, but American newspapers reported that "women and children were killed in the fighting with the Moros," and public opinion hardened. Secretary of War Taft demanded an explanation, and Mark Twain wrote scathingly that "we abolished them, in the ordinary way, in four days." 注Whether those who took refuge were combatants or refugees remains debated today, and whether to call it a "massacre" or a "battle" is a matter of one's position.

The Moro Rebellion effectively ended with Bud Bagsak, and in March 1915 the Sultan of Sulu relinquished political sovereignty (under the Carpenter Agreement).

11-3. Settlement policy — the seeds of today's conflict

American-era land law treated unregistered customary landholding (traditional to the Muslim and Lumad peoples) as "public land," while allocating homesteads to Christian settlers migrating from Luzon and the Visayas. Beginning in the 1920s, the American colonial government and, subsequently, the Philippine government carried out a planned migration of Christians from the Visayas and Luzon into Mindanao, and by the 1970s Christians outnumbered the Moro and Lumad populations there — a qualitative account on which this article agrees with the field articles "Indigenous Peoples and Ethnic Minorities" and "The Mindanao Region." Christians were also given preference in administrative appointments (as of 2026-08-27, the source has not been replaced: no primary source to substitute for the research summary cited by the earlier draft's English Wikipedia source could be identified in this session = needs re-verification).

This is the physical origin of today's Bangsamoro question. As of August 2026, the first Bangsamoro Autonomous Region (BARMM) parliamentary election, originally scheduled for 30 March 2026, has been postponed by the Commission on Elections (Comelec), and, following a Supreme Court ruling, is now set for 14 September 2026 (Comelec announcements, Daily Tribune, etc., January and July 2026). The unfinished business of the line drawn during the American period remains, still, a work in progress.


12. Filipino migration to the United States — the manong generation

Under the Treaty of Paris, Filipinos became "US nationals," which let them travel to the US mainland without being subject to the Asian exclusion laws. This loophole produced a major wave of migration in the early 20th century.

Year Event / figure
1903 The pensionado program begins — government-funded study at American universities. About 200 by 1906
1906 The first laborers travel to Hawaii's sugar and pineapple plantations (also to asparagus farms in California, lumber mills in Washington, and salmon canneries in Alaska)
1920 Over 5,600 Filipinos on the US mainland (around 400 circa 1910)
1930 Over 45,000 (of whom over 30,000 in California, 3,400 in Washington State)
1930 The Watsonville riots — a wave of exclusionary violence in rural California, with association with white women cited as one trigger
1934 The Tydings–McDuffie Act cuts the quota drastically to 50 people per year
1935 The Filipino Repatriation Act. Offered free passage home, but only a small share took it up — 1,900 as of October 1938 (TIME, 3 October 1938) / the program's final cumulative total was 2,190 (a small share against a Filipino population in the US of over 45,000 at the 1930 census) (source replaced 2026-08-27: the earlier draft cited the English Wikipedia article "Filipino Repatriation Act of 1935." Sources: EBSCO Research Starters; the original statutory text on govinfo.gov. Retrieved 2026-08-27). The US Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional in 1940, ending the program, which was succeeded by the Nationality Act of 1940
1946 The Luce–Celler Act. An annual quota of 100, plus naturalization rights

The layer known as the "manong generation" (manong, an Ilocano/Visayan honorific for an older man) consisted mostly of unmarried male agricultural seasonal workers, kept from forming families by anti-miscegenation laws. They form the foundation of Filipino American society, and are also the source of the labor movement that led to the 1965 Delano grape strike (led by figures such as Larry Itliong).

注 It's important to note that being a "US national" did not amount to citizenship. They had no voting rights and no path to naturalization, and in 1934 were overnight demoted to "aliens." This legal limbo was the essence of Filipino workers' vulnerability at the time.


13. Independence in 1946 and the Bell Trade Act — "the price of independence"

Item Content
Independence 4 July 1946 (Treaty of Manila). Manuel Roxas won the 23 April 1946 election with 54% of the vote
The Bell Trade Act Enacted in the US on 30 April 1946. Approved by the Philippine Congress two days before independence, on 2 July
Content ① Trade Free trade continued through 1954, after which tariffs rose 5% a year until becoming full in 1974
Content ② Currency The peso was fixed at 2:1 against the dollar, and remittances to the US were unrestricted
Content ③ Parity rights Granted US citizens and corporations rights equal to Filipino citizens in developing the Philippines' natural resources — requiring an amendment to the 1935 Constitution
Consideration Reconstruction aid of $800 million (offered)/$620 million in war-damage compensation under the Philippine Rehabilitation Act (1946) amounted to a de facto condition
Plebiscite 11 March 1947. Turnout 40%, with about 79% in favor of the constitutional amendment
Revision The Laurel–Langley Agreement. Dates completed in the 2026-08-25 verification: signed 15 December 1954 → after approval by both the US and Philippine Congresses, entered into force in 1955 (the US Congress's authorization came 1 August 1955, and the revised instrument was signed by Romulo and Langley on 6 September 1955 in Washington), expiring in 1974 (source replaced 2026-08-27: the earlier draft cited the English Wikipedia article "Laurel–Langley Agreement." Sources: the treaty text held at the Supreme Court E-Library, and the Philippine Senate's legislative research service. Retrieved 2026-08-27). 注Referring to it as "the 1955 agreement" reflects the entry-into-force year, not to be confused with the signing year (1954). It removed US control over the peso's exchange rate and made parity mutual

注"Full independence in 1946" is correct as a matter of legal form, but major elements of currency, trade, and resource development remained tied to the United States even after independence. The condition US High Commissioner McNutt described — "the Philippine economy is more dependent on the US market than any state of the Union" — carried straight through into the post-independence period. Today's 60/40 foreign-ownership restriction in the 1987 Constitution makes the most sense understood as a reaction against the experience of this parity clause.


14. The legacy that remains today (as of 2025–2026)

14-1. English

Indicator Figure Year / Source
EF English Proficiency Index (EF EPI), world ranking 28th of 123 countries/regions 2025 edition, EF Education First
Score 569 (−1 from prior year), classified "High" Same (world average 488)
By skill Writing 603 / Speaking 539 Same
Top in Asia Malaysia (24th, 581) Same
Number of English speakers 200,000 as a first language / 52 million as a second language 2020, Ethnologue

In the 2025 edition, the Philippines ceded its position as Asia's top-ranked country to Malaysia (BusinessWorld, 20 November 2025, among others). The premise that "the Philippines is Asia's foremost English-speaking country" no longer holds as of 2025 — at least on the EF EPI metric. 注 Note, however, that the EF EPI is based on self-selected online test-takers and is not representative of the population as a whole.

14-2. The education system

Elements derived from the United States and from Spain coexist in layers. Confusing them leads to practical errors.

Field Origin Concrete example
Constitutional structure US Presidential system, separation of powers, bill of rights, judicial review
Courts US The 1901 reorganization of the Supreme Court under Act No. 136 (first Chief Justice, Cayetano Arellano). Appeal to the US Supreme Court remained possible until 1946
Procedure and evidence law US (common law) Rules of civil procedure and evidence. However, a jury system was never introduced
Substantive private and criminal law Spain (civil law) The Civil Code, the Revised Penal Code
Land registration The Torrens system, of English/Australian origin, introduced during the American period Foundation of today's land-transaction practice
Language US The principal language of statutes and judicial decisions is English

注 Philippine law is not "American law" but rather a mixed jurisdiction. A Japanese company that assumes "it's in English, so it's the same as US law" can be caught out on family law, inheritance, and substantive criminal law.

14-4. IT-BPM — the biggest "legacy industry" of all

Indicator Figure Year / Source
IT-BPM revenue $38 billion 2024, IBPAP (Philstar, 16 January 2025)
IT-BPM revenue Over $40 billion (all-time high) Full year 2025, IBPAP (Philstar 29 January 2026, ABS-CBN 28 January 2026, among others)
Number of employed About 1.9 million IBPAP official website (confirmed August 2026)
2026 target About $42 billion, close to 2 million jobs IBPAP (Inquirer 24 September 2025, SunStar 5 January 2026)
2028 target Revised downward IBPAP, 14 July 2026 (GMA report). The reason cited for revising the roadmap is the shift to AI

The central issue of 2026 is the displacement of voice work by generative and agentic AI. IBPAP lowered its 2028 revenue and employment targets in July 2026. The 2026 picture is that English proficiency — an American-period legacy — is, for the first time, becoming "an asset that technology can render relative."

14-5. The impact of the 2026 Middle East conflict (from 28 February)

The structure created during the American period — "an economy dependent on a single external market" — has persisted in different forms, from sugar exports to the US, to OFW remittances, IT-BPM, and imported energy. The 2026 Middle East conflict struck directly at this vulnerability.

Indicator Figure Source / month
Q2 2026 GDP growth 注Figures differ by source: this article gives 2.3% (PSA, published 7 August 2026; BusinessWorld/GMA/Manila Bulletin), while §12-2 of the field article "The Japanese Occupation" gives about 2.8% (BusinessWorld, 7 August 2026) Cross-checked 2026-08-25. Both agree it is "the lowest level since the pandemic." Since it cannot be settled, both figures are given, and the source must always be specified when quoted
Q1 2026 GDP growth 2.8% (actual figure released by PSA) Consistent with §14-5 of "The Spanish Colonial Period" and §12-2 of "The Japanese Occupation"
Inflation, April 2026 7.2% (the highest level in about 3 years; March was 4.1%) PSA (Inquirer, 4 May 2026)
Same, May/June 6.8% / 6.4% PSA (Rappler 4 June 2026, GMA 7 July 2026)
ADB's 2026 growth outlook Revised down to 4.4% ADB (Manila Standard, 10 April 2026)
Inflation under the severe scenario Up to 7.5% Department of Economy, Planning, and Development (DEPDev), 10 March 2026 (GMA)
OFWs whose jobs are threatened in the Middle East Up to 340,000 8 April 2026 (GMA)
OFWs who have returned Over 4,000 (as of 20 April) Malacañang
People at risk of falling into poverty due to high fuel costs 1.34 million PIDS, 16 April 2026

注The general assumption that "the Philippines, being a domestically driven economy, is resilient to external shocks" did not hold in 2026. Petroleum is almost entirely imported, and BusinessWorld (4 March 2026) reported that the impact of the oil shock hit the Philippines harder than its Asia-Pacific peers. 注 The reliance on remittances — "exporting people" — is also structurally analogous to the American-period dependence on sugar.

14-6. Historical memory today


15. 注 Summary of points commonly gotten wrong

Common understanding The reality
The US bought the Philippines for $20 million The text says "cession + payment of $20 million." It is not a sale-and-purchase contract. The Philippine side was not party to the negotiations
The Philippine–American War ended in 1902 That was the declaration for the Christian-majority regions. The Moro Rebellion continued until 1913
The Philippine–American War killed X hundred thousand 200,000–250,000 is the typical range in modern historical scholarship. Estimates as high as 1 million also exist, and it makes a real difference whether combat deaths or excess deaths are meant
"48 of 78" died at the Balangiga incident The correct baseline is 74. 36 killed outright, 8 died of wounds, 4 missing, 22 wounded, 4 unharmed. "48" is a count that folds the missing into the dead (corrected in the 2026-08-25 verification)
US military rule ended on 16 June 1902 Taft became Civil Governor on 4 July 1901; the post of Military Governor was abolished on 4 July 1902, and Taft became the first Governor-General. Roosevelt proclaimed the war's end the same day (corrected in the 2026-08-25 verification)
All 3 Balangiga bells were in Wyoming 2 were in Wyoming, 1 was at Camp Red Cloud, US Forces Korea
The US apologized and returned the bells The return (December 2018) took place, but was carried out separately from any apology or reparations
The Thomasites made this the world's third-largest English-speaking country The ranking's metric and source could not be confirmed — unconfirmed. The 1925 Monroe Survey pointed to weak English proficiency and low school enrollment
The Philippines is Asia's foremost English-speaking country On the EF EPI 2025, it ranked 28th, with Malaysia topping Asia
The 1907 Assembly was Asia's first popularly elected legislature Unconfirmed. What is certain is "the first nationwide-elected legislature in Philippine history"
The Commonwealth was effectively an independent nation Foreign affairs and defense remained with the US. Legislation on currency, immigration, and trade required approval from the US President
Full independence came in 1946 The Bell Trade Act's parity clause and fixed exchange rate continued even after independence. Revised by the Laurel–Langley Agreement (signed 15 December 1954 / effective 1955 / expired 1974)
American rule developed the economy 85% of exports going to the US (1939) and owner-cultivated farms falling from 1.5 million to 800,000 (1918–1939) are two sides of the same coin
Philippine law = American law It is a mixed jurisdiction. Procedural law and the constitution are American in origin; civil and criminal law are Spanish in origin. There is no jury system
The American period is "a thing of the past" The first BARMM parliamentary election (scheduled 14 September 2026), RA 12027's return to English, and IT-BPM's response to AI — all of it remains a work in progress today

日本語の詳細版: 分野「歴史」「米国統治期」(本サイト日本語版)。