Textile & Garments Industry

As of 2026-08-31 · Updated 2026-08-31 · Section: Economy, Industry & Business · 日本語版

Textiles and garments were once one of the Philippines' three biggest export industries — so why has the sector shrunk to its current size? What remains, and what has been happening in 2025–2026? This article sorts through the numbers while paying close attention to where they come from and how definitions differ.

This is a textbook case of a sector where "what the industry associations say" and "what government statistics say" don't match. Even on something as basic as export value, as discussed below, two figures for the very same year, 2024, circulate side by side: "roughly $900 million" and "over $1.8 billion." Cite either one without checking the underlying definition — apparel only, versus "wearables" including footwear and travel goods — and you will get it wrong.

1. The big picture, first

"Roughly 15th" is a spoken remark from an industry-association executive and has not been corroborated against an official ranking such as the WTO's (unconfirmed). The metric is "apparel export value." Always attach this caveat when citing the ranking.

注 (Corrected in the 2026-08-25 verification pass) The "roughly +10%" growth-rate figure attached to the 2026 outlook has been removed. The original draft read "2025 roughly $1 billion → 2026 roughly $1.2 billion (up roughly +10% year on year)," but going from $1 billion to $1.2 billion is +20%, not +10% — an internal inconsistency. It is likely that FOBAP's remarks about a "low-single-billion-dollar range → $1.2 billion" level and a separate "+10%" growth figure were reported independently, and which one is correct could not be confirmed from the primary source (FOBAP's original statement). If you cite the growth rate, use "+10%"; if you cite the amount, use "roughly $1.2 billion" — do not multiply the two together and recompute. (Source: BusinessMirror, 10 June 2026 / 15 December 2025; arithmetic cross-check)

2. Why the decline? Five reasons

2-1. The MFA (Multi-Fibre Arrangement) and the 2005 abolition of quotas

International trade in textiles and garments was, from 1974, governed under the MFA (Multi-Fibre Arrangement), a special regime under which importing countries imposed quantitative quotas by country and product category. The Philippines was able to secure quota allocations for the US market, meaning it did not have to compete head-on with an ultra-low-cost giant like China. Textile and garment exports, which stood at $36 million in 1970, broke $1 billion in 1987, and by 1991 apparel had become the country's third-largest export category (BusinessMirror, editorial, 24 August 2016).

• In 1995, the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC), part of the WTO's founding, set a ten-year timetable to phase out MFA quotas
• On 1 January 2005, quotas were abolished entirely. This was the decisive blow.

注 Saying "the MFA expired in 2005" is, strictly speaking, inaccurate. The MFA itself ended at the close of 1994; 1995–2004 was a transitional period under the ATC during which quotas were phased out step by step. The accurate statement is "quantitative quotas were fully abolished on 1 January 2005."

The trajectory after quota abolition (from the same editorial; note that the source is a newspaper opinion piece, not a government statistical release):

2-2. No upstream textile base exists domestically

The Philippines effectively has no remaining spinning or weaving industrial base. Fabric and trims are entirely imported, and the only domestic process is CMT (Cut, Make, Trim) — cutting, sewing, and finishing — the lowest-value-added step there is (FOBAP/PTRI, BusinessMirror, 10 June 2026 / 7 December 2025).

DOST-PTRI (Philippine Textile Research Institute) director Julius Leaño: "This chronic decline is a symptom that what we do isn't matching what the market wants." "If they find a cheaper place, they'll pack up and leave. We lose the jobs." (BusinessMirror, 7 December 2025)

In May 2025, CONWEP (Confederation of Wearable Exporters of the Philippines) demanded that the government "bring the entire supply chain home" (BusinessMirror, 27 May 2025). As long as fabric relies on imports, the country cannot beat Vietnam or China on either lead time or cost — a structural problem.

2-3. Competition from China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh

• Philippine labor costs run roughly 15% higher than Vietnam, India, or China (The Star / Reuters wire, 2026-02-05)
• High electricity costs, and lagging productivity against more heavily mechanized rivals (same)
• Specifically: the nationwide average electricity rate is 12.43 pesos/kWh (June 2026 billing month, announced by the DOE on 20 July; higher than Singapore's 12.34, making it the highest in Southeast Asia). (Supplemented in the 2026-08-25 verification pass. Source: this site's own reference article "Electricity and Power Rates" — a figure confirmed consistently across seven cross-referenced articles. Whenever writing "electricity costs are high," always attach this figure and its date.)
• Philippine-made apparel runs 10–15% higher than ASEAN rivals (FOBAP, BusinessMirror, 25 July 2026)
• Vietnam has an FTA with the EU, and in 2023 European brands actually shifted orders from the Philippines to Vietnam (BusinessMirror, 3 August 2023)

2-4. The expiry of the US GSP (Generalized System of Preferences)

• The US GSP expired on 31 December 2020, after which Philippine exports to the US reverted to preference-free MFN tariff rates (CONWEP, BusinessMirror, 27 May 2025)
• As of August 2026, no reauthorization has been reported (unconfirmed). UNCTAD, too, argued in March 2026 that "eroding preferences are a cost to development" (UNCTAD, 25 March 2026)
• 注 The claim that "the Philippines is a US GSP beneficiary, so travel goods enter duty-free" is outdated information that stopped being true in 2020. It is true that travel goods were once added to the list of GSP-eligible items, but the program itself has since lapsed.

Meanwhile, the EU side is still active: - The Philippines is a beneficiary of the EU's GSP+. The current GSP+ scheme is due to expire in 2027 (GMA Network, 16 October 2025) - The utilization rate of EU preferences in 2025 was 80% (PNA, 24 March 2026) - PH-EU FTA negotiations are in their final stretch. DFA Secretary Ma. Theresa Lazaro said on 30 June 2026 that "a conclusion within a few months is possible" (ABS-CBN, 30 June 2026). The goal is for the FTA to take effect before GSP+ expires - In 2023, CONWEP projected that two years after a PH-EU FTA took effect, it would generate 120,000 to 250,000 additional jobs (BusinessMirror, 2 August 2023) this is an industry-association projection

2-5. Minimum wage and labor intensity

Textiles and garments are a quintessentially labor-intensive industry, so wages hit the bottom line directly. CONWEP uses a rule of thumb: "roughly 250,000 direct jobs for every $1 billion of exports" (executive director Maritess Jocson-Agoncillo, BusinessMirror, 27 May 2025). (Wording corrected in the 2026-08-25 verification pass. The original draft's phrasing was garbled and has been read as a typo for "per $1 billion of exports.") The flip side: when wages rise, orders are the first thing to flee.

The 2026 NCR wage increase is currently tied up in litigation: - 30 June 2026: The NCR Wage Board approved an 85-peso (roughly 12.23%) increase, covering about 1.1 million workers (Rappler) - 25 July 2026: The first tranche of 60 pesos took effect (BusinessMirror, 13 July 2026) - 30 July 2026: The Pasig Regional Trial Court (Branch 152) issued a 20-day TRO (temporary restraining order), on petitions from construction firms Readycon Trading and Construction Corp. and R-II Builders, Inc. (BusinessWorld) - 13 August 2026: The order shifted into a preliminary injunction and remains in force (GMA Network) - 12 August 2026: Labor groups petitioned the Supreme Court to lift the TRO; on 17 August, DOLE filed a motion for reconsideration (BusinessMirror)

注注 (Corrected in the 2026-08-25 verification pass. Source: cross-verified figures from this site's reference article "Minimum Wage and Labor" §2 / BusinessWorld / statistical data) - What's enjoined is "the first tranche, +60 pesos (i.e., the 755-peso level itself)," not "the second tranche, +25 pesos." The original draft of this section and the §9 table stated that "the second tranche to the full 780 pesos is in litigation" — this was wrong. The accurate statement as of 25 August 2026 is that it is legally undetermined whether the NCR statutory floor is 695 pesos or 755 pesos. - The second tranche (+25 pesos, to 780 pesos) is scheduled to take effect on 20 January 2027, which in any case has not yet arrived within 2026. - ✅ (Resolved in the 2026-08-25 re-verification pass) The apparent "discrepancy" in the injunction bond is not a contradiction — it is two different figures from two different stages. Per the timeline in this site's reference article "Minimum Wage and Labor" §2-2 — - The 30 July 2026 TRO (temporary restraining order) = a bond of 1 million pesos (BusinessWorld) - The 13 August 2026 preliminary injunction (writ of preliminary injunction) = an injunction bond of 10 billion pesos (BusinessWorld / Inquirer) Both this article's original draft figure of "10 billion pesos" and the reference article's "1 million pesos" are both correct — they simply correspond to different stages. Whenever citing this, always state whether it's the TRO or the preliminary injunction, and the date of the order. (This is treated as a textbook case of Verification Rule #4, "when figures conflict, first suspect the metric or the stage," and has been added to §E.) - Article 126 of the Labor Code states that "no court or entity shall issue a temporary or permanent injunction... against any and all proceedings before the NWPC and the Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Boards." This is reportedly the first time a regional trial court has halted a wage order. As of 20 August 2026 the injunction remains in force and is pending before the Supreme Court (same §2-2, Manila Times). - Practical guidance: the injunction is not an order that "755 pesos must not be paid." Budgeting and paying at 755 pesos is the conservative approach (same §2-3).

The cumulative NCR wage increase under the Marcos Jr. administration is 158 pesos over 3 years, exceeding the Aquino administration's 109 pesos over six years and the Duterte administration's 46 pesos (BusinessMirror, 5 September 2025). CONWEP claims the wage increases cut 2024 export performance by $260 million (same). 注This is an industry-association estimate, not a government-verified figure. 注 (Annotation added in the 2026-08-25 verification pass) The "roughly 25%" ratio that the original draft paired with this figure does not square with the article's other numbers. For $260 million to be 25%, the base would need to be roughly $1.04 billion, but CONWEP's own 2024 wearables export figure is over $1.8 billion (§4), against which the ratio works out to only about 14%. Because the base (apparel only vs. wearables, actuals vs. plan) cannot be pinned down, the ratio has been removed and only the dollar figure retained. Always confirm the base before citing a ratio. Labor groups on the other side (Sentro, KMU, Bukluran, PIGLAS) counter that "the main driver of lost competitiveness is not wages but power costs and smuggling." IBON Foundation estimates a nationwide family living wage of 1,218 pesos (same).

3. 2025–2026 — turmoil over US tariffs

Over these two years the legal basis for US tariffs has changed three times. Getting the timeline straight is essential to understanding where things stand.

3-1. What's behind the 12.5% "forced-labor tariff"

• Basis: Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The result of a USTR investigation, covering roughly 60 economies, into enforcement regimes against imports of forced-labor goods
• Reason: The Philippines had not enacted domestic legislation banning the import of goods made with forced labor (this is not a trade dispute in itself). Inflows of goods originating in China and Myanmar were the concern (BusinessMirror, 27 July 2026)
• Rate structure: The 10% bracket includes Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Canada, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and others. The 12.5% bracket covers China, Vietnam, and "other investigated countries" (Wiley Rein, 27 July 2026)
• Exclusions: Steel, aluminum, copper, wood products, automobiles, semiconductors, civil aircraft and parts, and pharmaceutical ingredients. Plus 471 excluded product lines (instant coffee, seeds, animal feed, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, fertilizer, agrochemical ingredients, humanitarian goods, etc.)
• Apparel is not on the exclusion list — it takes the hit directly
• Cargo already loaded was exempt if cleared by 28 July

3-2. The Philippine response (July–August 2026)

• July 2026: A joint DTI-DOLE-DOF administrative order (JAO) was signed, establishing procedures to investigate and ban imports of forced-labor goods (BusinessMirror, 5 August 2026)
• A task force to crack down on forced-labor goods was established (Daily Tribune, 26 July 2026)
• DTI Undersecretary for trade Ceferino Rodolfo: "We're in close coordination with the USTR on the JAO's evaluation." Review is on an ongoing basis, with no fixed schedule (same)
• According to the DTI, actual shipment turn-backs on forced-labor grounds total about $2.71 million, a very small fraction against $48.25 billion in US-bound exports from 2023 through early 2026 (BusinessMirror, 25 July 2026). 注(Corrected in the 2026-08-25 verification pass) The original draft stated "roughly 0.01%," but $2.71 million ÷ $48.25 billion = roughly 0.0056%, so the correct figure is "roughly 0.006%." The "0.01%" reported in the media may be a rounding or a misprint, so anyone citing a ratio should redo the division themselves
• Ambassador to the US Jose Manuel Romualdez: "If proven, we'll negotiate on the premise of removing child-labor goods from the export list" (same)
• 注 On 17 August 2026, the US side named the Philippines an "enabler of transshipment" for Chinese-origin goods (BusinessMirror). This is a headwind for tariff-reduction negotiations
• 4 August 2026: 25 US states sued over the Section 301 forced-labor tariff (Supply Chain Dive). The future of the regime itself remains uncertain
• IEEPA-tariff refunds: $81 billion already returned (LawStreet Journal, 23 August 2026); Reuters has reported a figure as high as $182 billion. 注Confirmed and estimated figures are mixed together here, so always attach the source when citing a number

3-3. The impact of the Middle East conflict (from 28 February 2026)

The Middle East conflict, which began in late February 2026, has hit textiles and apparel primarily through cost.

• On 2 March 2026, Philexport (Philippine Exporters Confederation) warned that airspace closures and disrupted logistics routes were already underway, and that electronics, apparel, processed food, and furniture were facing higher shipping rates, longer transit times, and higher insurance premiums (BusinessMirror, 2 March 2026, following Iranian strikes on 1 March)
• Philexport vice chair Flordeliza Leong urged members to review supply chains, hedge cost swings, and consider alternative routes and markets
• Because the Philippines imports most of its petroleum, rising fuel costs feed straight into manufacturing and transport costs, eroding price competitiveness (same)
• On 3 April 2026, Manila Bulletin reported rising inflation risk from Houthi attacks
• On 22 July 2026, the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait was closed (Al Jazeera). On 28 July, The Guardian reported "Asia faces an energy crisis from the Red Sea oil blockade"
• On 1 July 2026, congestion from NAIA's cargo-terminal transfer and passenger-terminal construction, combined with high utilization and slow container pickup at the Port of Manila, coinciding with the southwest monsoon, created a "double punch" (Dimerco Asia Pacific Freight Report; AISL — the International Association of Independent Tanker Owners... [Association of Ship Liners]; BusinessMirror, 1 July 2026)

Apparel is lightweight and thin-margin, making it acutely vulnerable to swings in freight rates and delivery times. In 2026, it faces a "quadruple squeeze": tariffs, wages, freight, and fuel.

4. The current scale — beware conflicting figures

注注 Two different export values circulate for the same year

Sources: FOBAP = BusinessMirror, 15 December 2025 / 10 June 2026; CONWEP = BusinessMirror, 27 May 2025.

FOBAP chairman Robert Young further states that informal exports carried out via suitcase or through balikbayan boxes run $200–300 million a year (BusinessMirror, 10 June 2026), centered on the tiangge-style garment cluster in Taytay, Rizal. This does not appear in official statistics.

注 The PSA's (Philippine Statistics Authority) official trade statistics were inaccessible during this research due to bot-blocking, so an item-level confirmation could not be made (unconfirmed). All the figures above are industry-association releases, not government-confirmed values. For reference, on a PSA basis, the first half of 2026 showed total exports of $46.72 billion (+13.1% year on year), imports of $77.53 billion (+17.8%), and a trade deficit of $30.81 billion (+25.9%), with imports at their highest level in 35 years (BusinessMirror, 30 July 2026).

Employment and establishments

注 Official statistics on the number of establishments (the PSA's ASPBI — Annual Survey of Philippine Business and Industry — for "apparel manufacturing") could not be obtained this time (unconfirmed). One can only get a sense of scale from individual closures on the ground:

• October 2025: A Central Luzon garment factory considered closure, putting roughly 3,000 jobs at risk (Senator Imee Marcos, BusinessMirror, 20 October 2025)
• February 2026: Charter Link Clark Inc. (a Lululemon supplier in the Clark Freeport) suspended operations, costing about 500 jobs (The Star / Reuters wire, 5 February 2026)
• September 2025: CONWEP cited a case of a Japanese baseball-glove manufacturer that closed after 40 years of operation, triggered by a 50-peso wage increase (BusinessMirror, 5 September 2025)
• May 2024: Over 5,000 garment workers lost their jobs (Inquirer, 7 May 2024)

5. The Negative List and foreign investment

Textile and apparel manufacturing is not subject to foreign-ownership restrictions.

Neither List A nor List B of the 13th Regular Foreign Investment Negative List (EO 113, signed 13 April 2026, took effect in early May 2026) lists textile, apparel, or footwear manufacturing. 100% foreign ownership is therefore possible.

注注 "50 or more employees" is the old standard (RA 8179). It was eased to 15 by RA 11647 (2022). A great deal of Japanese-language material still cites "50." 注 The claim that "the current list is the 12th Negative List (EO 175, 2022)" is likewise outdated. As of August 2026, the current list is the 13th (EO 113).

In practice, most export-oriented sewing factories are located as export enterprises registered with PEZA (Philippine Economic Zone Authority). Under the CREATE MORE Act, the following are available (per DTI, BusinessMirror, 14 January 2026):

• An additional 100% deduction on power expenses
• An additional 50% deduction on direct labor cost
• Zero-rated VAT if export sales are 70% or more

In January 2026, DTI Secretary Cristina Roque said "automation is no longer optional — it's the baseline requirement of the global market," and rolled out flexible financing for equipment/automation via LandBank and DBP, BOI incentives, and a TESDA partnership to train sewing operators and machine technicians (same). The industry has also called for a VAT rate cut to ASEAN levels, which DTI is reportedly considering.

6. What's still standing

6-1. Apparel OEM (CMT)

Heavily dependent on the US, with no easy way to diversify away from it.

FOBAP chairman Robert Young: "In volume, no one else can match America. Export business doesn't work without volume." (The Star / Reuters wire, 5 February 2026)

The path the industry points to is shifting toward higher-value items involving hand embroidery and fine finishing, and toward alternate markets such as the Middle East and Europe (same). There is a trend of global buyers diversifying away from concentration in Vietnam, Bangladesh, and India, and FOBAP's 2026 read is that the Philippines has room to pick up small-lot, flexible orders as a result (BusinessMirror, 10 June 2026).

6-2. Handloom weaving — piña, hablon, inabel, t'nalak

Industrial-scale textiles have vanished, but handloom weaving survives as a regional industry.

Developments in 2025–2026: - In September 2025, piña weaving from Aklan received the Philippines' third Geographical Indication (GI) registration (Manila Bulletin, 23 September 2025). The two earlier registrations were Guimaras mangoes and Alburquerque's asin tibuok (salt) (Philstar, 24 January 2026) - In December 2025, a pineapple-fiber processing facility opened in Aklan (Philstar, 14 December 2025) - In May 2026, an ASEAN forum praised Western Visayas' GI promotion efforts (Manila Bulletin, 14 May 2026) - DOST-PTRI's Ilocos Region yarn-production center supplies domestically produced yarn to over 1,550 weavers across Ilocos and the Cordilleras - In 2026, Tarlac Province joined the Philippine Textile Map, covering 900 weavers and crocheters - 注 Alfombra (woven footwear) weaving in Pateros has collapsed "from several hundred artisans to just two" (Rappler, 17 May 2026). Handicraft traditions are "surviving," but not "safe"

6-3. Barong tagalog fabric and RA 9242

RA 9242, the "Philippine Tropical Fabrics Act" (enacted 10 February 2004), requires that government employee uniforms use Philippine tropical fabric.

• "Tropical fabric" = fabric containing natural fibers produced, spun, woven/knitted, and finished within the Philippines
• Implementing agency: the CSC (Civil Service Commission), with the DA, DOST, and DTI cooperating. An annual report to Congress is required
• In June 2026, DOST-PTRI pushed for stricter compliance with the PTF law (InsiderPH, 23 June 2026)

This law matters because it is a mechanism that institutionally creates real demand for piña, hablon, and abaca fabric used in barong tagalog. Annual government-uniform demand is one of the largest stable customer bases for handloom-weaving communities. 注 Official compliance-rate statistics could not be confirmed this time (unconfirmed).

6-4. Marikina, the shoe city

• Marikina City = the "Shoe Capital of the Philippines"
• The "world's largest shoe" in front of city hall received Guinness World Record certification in 2002, and was restored and reopened in June 2026 (BusinessMirror, 10 June 2026)
• 注 There is no reliable, up-to-date statistic on the number of operating factories. A report from as of July 2021 claimed "106 factories operating," but the source was a social-media post, and it should be treated as unconfirmed
• In April 2025, Senator Aquilino "Koko" Pimentel III filed Senate Bill 2994, the "Philippine Shoe Industry Strengthening Act." Its pillars are a DTI-led Shoe Industry Development Program (with DOST/TESDA partnership), a Shoe Industry Development Fund (SIDF, 10-year) funded by import-shoe tariff revenue, and a pilot manufacturing hub in Marikina (BusinessMirror, 14 April 2025)
• In 2025, DTI supported the footwear sector through FTA utilization and overseas market development (BusinessMirror, 1 January 2025)
• The structural problems are competition from cheap imported shoes and a shortage of successors. In 2025 the city began recruiting young cobbler apprentices (ABS-CBN, 23 April 2025)

7. PhilFIDA and abaca

PhilFIDA (Philippine Fiber Industry Development Authority), under the Department of Agriculture (DA), handles research, technical support, production assistance, and regulation for natural fibers — abaca, piña, maguey, salago, kenaf, kapok, coconut fiber, buntal, cotton, and others. Note that it sits under the DA, not the DTI (the industrial side of fabric and apparel falls under DTI and DOST-PTRI).

7-1. Production statistics (drawn from PhilFIDA primary sources)

2025 commercial-fiber baling volumes (metric tons) (from PhilFIDA's original PDF, "Monthly Baling of Philippine Commercial Fibers 2025")

January–June 2026 (from the same, 2026-edition PDF)

注 (Annotation added in the 2026-08-25 verification pass) Adding up the listed fibers in the two tables above does not equal the stated "total." - 2025: 39,088.638 + 11,623.125 + 29.615 + 25.875 + 126.375 + 11.441 = 50,905.069, versus a stated total of 50,963.740 (a gap of 58.671) - Jan–Jun 2026: 18,579.750 + 6,958.750 = 25,538.500, versus a stated total of 25,675.373 (a gap of 136.873) This is not an error — it is because PhilFIDA's original table folds in small-volume fibers such as maguey and ramie into its total, while this article excerpts only the major items. Do not reconstruct the total by adding the excerpted rows. Conversely, misreading "total = abaca + coir" will produce a number that doesn't match. (Source: PhilFIDA, "Monthly Baling of Philippine Commercial Fibers," 2025 and 2026 editions PDF; arithmetic cross-check)

注 "Baling" is not raw production — it is the volume of fiber that has been graded, baled, and put into trade. This differs from an FAO-style "production" statistic, so the two should not be compared directly.

7-2. 注注 Multiple "world share" figures circulate

Whenever citing a ranking or share, always specify "share of what" and "which year." For abaca, the safest formulation is "the world's largest producer (metric: production volume, 63.5% per FAO, 2020)." Ecuador ranks second.

7-3. Moves toward higher value-added products (2025–2026)

• DOST-PTRI positions natural fibers as the Philippines' "premium niche." Director Leaño explains it this way: "Germany does high-performance materials, China does volume in polyester, Egypt does quality cotton. The Philippines can build an identity around natural fiber." (BusinessMirror, 26 April 2026)
• Exported as raw material, it fetches only about 50 cents per unit. The strategy is to capture more value by turning it into finished products (same)
• On 16 April 2026, a "Natural Fiber Innovation Hub" opened at Laguna State University — the third such hub nationally, and the first in Calabarzon, with about 6 million pesos in equipment. From 40 kg of fiber it can produce roughly 410 meters of fabric — enough for about 100 uniforms. Water hyacinth from Laguna de Bay is also being put to use (same)
• In August 2025, PTRI began researching saluyot (jute/molokhia) as a "golden fiber" (BusinessMirror, 31 August 2025)
• PTRI is advancing a Japanese-funded sericulture (silk-farming) project (2025–2026), technology licensing (contracts signed with four companies in June 2026), and practical applications of non-woven fabric (adopted by nine companies) (PTRI)
• In May 2025, there was a move to propose using abaca fiber in banknotes to the BSP (central bank) (BusinessWorld, 20 May 2025)
• In August 2026, PhilFIDA carried out partnerships with the plastics/upcycling industry, abaca-leather product development, and hands-on training on abaca spinning machines in Baguio (PhilFIDA, 12–20 August 2026)
• In July 2026, DOST showcased non-woven fibers and called for industry support (PNA, 1 July 2026)

8. Relationships with Japanese companies

8-1. Fast Retailing's (Uniqlo, GU) production-partner list

A primary source was checked directly. Tabulating all 705 factories by country from Fast Retailing's "Production Partner List (as of March 2, 2026)" Excel file:

The Philippines has just a single factory: Adriste Philippines, Inc., in a PEZA zone on Loakan Road in Baguio City, Cordillera Administrative Region. Its category is "Accessories/Goods," classified as a Garment Factory, with under 1,000 employees, 75% of whom are women. The parent company is ADRISTE (HONG KONG) LTD., and there is no labor union.

This single line item shows most clearly that the Philippines is not a major sourcing base for Japanese fast fashion. One factory against 355 in China and 113 in Vietnam.

注 MUJI's (Ryohin Keikaku) supplier list could not be obtained this time due to a server-side restriction (HTTP 429) (unconfirmed). Before writing "MUJI sews in the Philippines," always check the company's own published list.

8-2. Trends on the Japanese market side

• On 4 July 2026, Nikkei Asia reported that "Japan's apparel imports from China have hit a 31-year low, as sourcing shifts to Southeast Asia." Japanese apparel sourcing is moving away from China toward ASEAN
• However, the beneficiaries of that shift are Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Cambodia, and, as the list above shows, the Philippines has not become a major recipient. The reasons are the structural problems covered in §§2-2–2-3 (zero domestic fabric production, labor costs, power costs, and insufficient volume)
• As an individual Japanese case, the industry has cited a baseball-glove manufacturer that closed after 40 years, triggered by a wage increase (CONWEP, BusinessMirror, 5 September 2025). 注The company name has not been reported
• In March 2025, it was reported that Japanese companies were planning 23.5 billion pesos in investment in the Philippines (Philstar, 9 March 2025). However, the breakdown for textiles/apparel specifically is unclear (unconfirmed)

9. Points that are easy to get wrong (a summary)

10. Points to watch in the second half of 2026

1. Negotiations over withdrawing the Section 301 12.5% tariff (DTI Usec. Rodolfo) — the JAO's evaluation is ongoing, with no fixed timeline. Withdrawal would be an upside factor for the $1.2 billion 2026 outlook
2. The 25-state lawsuit against Section 301 (August 2026) — the tariff regime itself could still be overturned again
3. The "transshipment enabler" designation over Chinese goods (17 August 2026) — a risk of further measures
4. The injunction against the 85-peso NCR wage increase — depending on the Supreme Court's ruling, this will decide the fate of both the already-effective first tranche of 60 pesos (755 pesos) and the second tranche of 25 pesos scheduled for 20 January 2027 (corrected in the 2026-08-25 verification pass, which had previously described only "the fate of the second tranche")
5. Conclusion of the PH-EU FTA (hinted at as possible within months in 2026) — since GSP+ expires in 2027, a gap in coverage would slow momentum toward Europe
6. The Middle East conflict and the Red Sea/Bab-el-Mandeb chokepoint — freight, fuel, and insurance costs. These bite hard on lightweight, thin-margin apparel
7. Legislative momentum on the Philippine Textile Revitalization Act and Senate Bill 2994 (footwear)
8. Moves toward higher-value natural fibers (PTRI hubs, leveraging Aklan piña's GI status) — since volume isn't coming back, this is where realistic growth is most likely

日本語の詳細版: 分野「経済・産業・ビジネス」「繊維・アパレル産業」（本サイト日本語版）。